Scan report

helm / helm

Vulnerability High

Could an attacker exploit mistakes in this code?

108 risk score

Serious issues. Review the high-severity findings before using it.

High
12
Medium
30
Low
6

Sources: Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit

Malicious pattern Low

Does this code look like it is trying to cause harm?

1 risk score

Minor issues. Worth a glance, unlikely to be urgent.

High
2
Medium
0
Low
4

Sources: YARA, ClamAV, GuardDog, dependency checker

Findings overview
54 total findings
Likely real
20
Uncertain
17
Likely noise
17

The risk classifier rates every finding for how likely it is to be a real issue. Likely noise still counts, just much less.

What we found, in plain English

This repository has a high vulnerability score of 108, which means that insecure coding patterns are present and could be exploited by attackers to steal secrets or inject malicious code. While the malicious-pattern risk is very low at 1.0, suggesting the code does not appear to be intentionally harmful, the majority of the issues found are standard security mistakes rather than signs of a hidden attack. Most of these problems involve common practices like using unverified user data in commands, hardcoding private keys, or failing to escape HTML content properly when dealing with user input. The scan also identified specific risks such as missing TLS version settings and potential denial-of-service attacks that could be mitigated by following the recommendations listed for each finding.

Written by a local language model from the findings below. The risk scores come from the classifier, not from this summary.

Detections by engine

  • Semgrep 48

    Pattern-based code analysis · Vulnerability

  • YARA 5

    Malware signature rules · Malicious pattern

  • GuardDog 1

    Supply-chain attack heuristics · Malicious pattern

Score over time

Overall score each time this repository was scanned.

Findings

Highest severity first. Select a finding to see the code and what it means.